Right, over short distances it can be closely approximated with just a constant radius or even a series of straight sections, though working out the optimum bend points requires a bit more horn design knowledge, so the 825/828 are half size ~55 Hz exponential (flare factor ('T', aka 'M') = 1)/~110 Hz actual, IOW it's a section sliced out of a larger, longer expo horn. Since the 816 has the same throat area, axial length and side wall radius terminating into a smaller mouth it will have a T = < 1 or moving towards hyperbolic (T = 0.5), so we tend to call any flare between the two a hypex, then define it by its flare factor T (M).
I've never bothered to work out any of the parallel wall horn's flare factors or seen them published, so all I can say about the lot is that I highly recommend going to the extra effort of cloning an 825/828 horn for HIFI/HT apps due to its much smoother response, especially when wings are used, and adding its slanted bottom plate to the dual driver designs. Note that if wings are used in the home that bass traps are normally required behind them due to the cavity resonances that occur in a typical room.
GM
Bookmarks